2 Apr
2003
2 Apr
'03
7:11 p.m.
Hi!
Frank Strauss writes:
Frank>Such a change is not necessary. The SMIv1 output as it is produced now Frank>is valid and reflects more closely what the original SMIv2 defines.
What was produced as output was the same definition as existed in the SMIv2 MIB module. Will a MIB browser that only understands SMIv1 know what an InetAddressType SYNTAX is?
Kristine Adamson IBM Communications Server for MVS: TCP/IP Development Internet e-mail:adamson@us.ibm.com