Re: [libsmi] Status of SMI DTD v0.1

...

...

...

...

Frank Fock writes:

Frank> What are the plans about an update of the SMI DTD draft?

Frank Strauss already said that the idea is to switch from a DTD to a more precise Schema definition in the next revision of the draft.

Frank> Any chance to advance this to a standard?

Not a real standard in the sense of an IETF Standards Track document. I think the ultimate goal should be to publish a final version of this as either Informational of Experimental RFC.

Frank> I did not encounter any problems with the DTD during Frank> implementation, however I recognized that smidump seems to Frank> violate the DTD regarding CDATA generation (for example the Frank> description element).

Perhaps the problem is the DTD and not smidump. :-)

/js