Hi!
Frank> Yes, you are right! I only checked whether the generated XML Frank> output was wellformed. I tried to validate it today with RXP Frank> and found some issues. I have fixed them and updated the Frank> (above) example. Now the example can be validated which shows Frank> that the DTD is valid too ;-)
I checked your example again using SAX2Count from Xerces against the current version of our XML Schema. There's just a minor issue that's not yet according to what the Schema says and the DTD `intends':
There should be no `read-create' values for <access> elements. Instead, if a row can be created/deleted, the <row> element should have a `create="true"' attribute and the <access> elements should just contain the value `readwrite'.
Furthermore, the <access> element values will be restricted in the XML Schema to the meaningful values `noaccess', `notifyonly', `readonly', and `readwrite', which we currently do not write with a hyphen.
Of course, this is just nit-picking at this point. I just wanted to let you know.
-frank -- !! This message is brought to you via the `libsmi' mailing list. !! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or !! unsubscribe, send a mail message to libsmi-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de. !! See http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/ for more information.