Keith> A little while ago I sent an addition to libsmi that provided Python Keith> bindings using SWIG. I'm not sure it that actually went through as I was Keith> having email problems. Did you see it?
Yes, thanks Keith! I (as the mailinglist owner) just had to resubmit it to the list, since the list allows only members to post and your submission was sent from your new email adress before you resubscribed with your new address. You can check it yourself on the mailinglist archive at http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/mail/.
Sorry, I did not yet find time to look at it and I'm not familiar with Python (yet?). I know that Juergen took a look and now understands your demand for an additional OID data structure. We think, this would help to use SWIG, but we also think that it is more important to keep the core C API not overloaded with nested data structures.
May I put your tarball to our public FTP archive? -- !! This message is brought to you via the `libsmi' mailing list. !! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or !! unsubscribe, send a mail message to libsmi-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de. !! See http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/ for more information.
On 31 Mar 2000, Frank Strauss wrote:
Keith> A little while ago I sent an addition to libsmi that provided Python Keith> bindings using SWIG. I'm not sure it that actually went through as I was Keith> having email problems. Did you see it?
Yes, thanks Keith! I (as the mailinglist owner) just had to resubmit it to the list, since the list allows only members to post and your submission was sent from your new email adress before you resubscribed with your new address. You can check it yourself on the mailinglist archive at http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/mail/.
Sorry, I did not yet find time to look at it and I'm not familiar with Python (yet?). I know that Juergen took a look and now understands your demand for an additional OID data structure. We think, this would help to use SWIG, but we also think that it is more important to keep the core C API not overloaded with nested data structures.
Thanks for taking a look. Perhaps this case warrants one small concession? 8-)
May I put your tarball to our public FTP archive?
Certainly. I hope it's useful to somebody. However, it still needs a lot of work...
Question: how "complete" would you say libsmi is now? is it really almost ready for 1.0? Do you anticipate any great changes to the API?
/___\|//__//// \ (+ +) \\ -- --------------------oOOo~(_)~oOOo---------------------------------------- Keith Dart mailto:kdart@kdart.com http://www.kdart.com/~kdart/ ============================================================================
-- !! This message is brought to you via the `libsmi' mailing list. !! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or !! unsubscribe, send a mail message to libsmi-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de. !! See http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/ for more information.
participants (2)
-
Frank Strauss -
Keith Dart