Andrew> Has anyone done this? Andrew> I tried libsmi-0.1.8 and built with bison 1.25, flex 2.5.4, and gcc Andrew> either 2.7.2.3 or 2.8.1. I've found three items so far.

Andrew> 1. Probably minor. Shouldn't 18446744073709551615 be typed? Andrew> (And the 0 a couple of lines above just for consistency.) I Andrew> notice that by 0.1.9-pre9 it acquired UL but my versions of Andrew> gcc want ULL.

Yes. Thanks.

Andrew> 2. You can't run "make check" until you have run "make install". It Andrew> looks like "check" doesn't look for the mib files in the build tree. I Andrew> suggest:

Right. Thanks.

I've applied both suggested patches. They'll show up in the next release.

Andrew> This is one of many dumps I got from during "make check" Andrew> before I ran "make install". [...]

Yes. libsmi has problems when its data gets inconsistent due to erroneous or missed modules.

Andrew> 3. The test scripts assume you have GNU diff. Solaris's Andrew> doesn't take the same parameters. The setup of the diff Andrew> program should be determined by ./configure similar to the Andrew> usual search for gawk/nawk/awk. e.g. my version of GNU diff is Andrew> gdiff, so look for gdiff/diff, then test the version.

Ok, I'll change this. -- !! This message is brought to you via the `libsmi' mailing list. !! Please do not reply to this message to unsubscribe. To subscribe or !! unsubscribe, send a mail message to libsmi-request@ibr.cs.tu-bs.de. !! See http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/projects/libsmi/ for more information.